-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/sync dev after v1.52.1 #245
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request focus on simplifying the path resolution for the OFAC list in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
client/chain/ofac.go (1)
42-42
: Approve changes with a suggestion for improvement.The new implementation of
getOfacListPath
is more concise and potentially more robust. It eliminates complex directory traversal logic and usespath.Join
for proper path construction across different operating systems.However, the use of a relative path (
".."
) assumes the current directory structure, which might be fragile if the project structure changes in the future.Consider using a more robust method to determine the project root, such as looking for a specific marker file (e.g.,
.project_root
) or using an environment variable. This would make the code more resilient to potential changes in the project structure.Example implementation:
func getOfacListPath() string { projectRoot := findProjectRoot() return getFileAbsPath(path.Join(projectRoot, "metadata", ofacListFilename)) } func findProjectRoot() string { // Implementation to find the project root // This could involve looking for a marker file or using an environment variable }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- client/chain/ofac.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (3)
client/chain/ofac.go (3)
9-9
: LGTM: Import ofpath
package.The addition of the
path
package import is appropriate for the new implementation ofgetOfacListPath
.
Line range hint
1-94
: Summary of changes and their impact.The changes in this file focus on improving the path resolution for the OFAC list. The new implementation in
getOfacListPath
is more concise and potentially more robust, eliminating complex directory traversal logic. These changes should not affect the overall functionality of the OFAC checking.Key points:
- The
path
package is now imported and used appropriately.- The
getOfacListPath
function has been simplified.- The rest of the file remains unchanged, maintaining the existing OFAC checking functionality.
While the changes are an improvement, consider the suggestions for further enhancing the robustness of the path resolution and verifying its correctness in different environments.
42-42
: Verify path resolution in different environments.While the changes to
getOfacListPath
should not affect the overall behavior of the OFAC checking functionality, it's important to ensure that the new path resolution works correctly in different environments (development, testing, production).Please run the following script to verify the path resolution:
This script will help verify that the OFAC list path is correctly resolved and that the file exists at the expected location.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good to me
Summary by CodeRabbit